barcodeaddin.com

n Pi /dii M j=1, j=i in .NET Implementation Code-128 in .NET n Pi /dii M j=1, j=i




How to generate, print barcode using .NET, Java sdk library control with example project source code free download:
n Pi /dii M j=1, j=i use .net vs 2010 code 128b drawer todeploy code 128 code set b for .net interleaved 2 of 5 (4.11). P j /dinj Here, as shown in .net vs 2010 Code 128B Fig. 4.

6, dii is the distance from the mobile in cell i using the channel in question to its base station, transmitting at power Pi , while di j is the distance from an interfering mobile in cell j to the base station in cell i. Pj represents the transmitting power of that mobile. The parameter n, ranging typically in value from 2 to 4, is, of course, the propagation exponent discussed in 2.

There are assumed to be some number M of interfering mobiles using the same channel, each located in a different cell. Equation (4.11) may be rewritten in a somewhat more general form as SIRi = Pi G ii.

M j=1 M j=1 (4.12). P j G i j Pi G ii P j (G i j /G ii ) Pi The term G i j is Visual Studio .NET USS Code 128 the so-called gain factor (actually an attenuation!) between transmitter j (mobile j in the uplink case) and receiver i (base station i in this case). In the average power case under discussion here, we, of course, have G i j 1/dinj .

The objective with power control is to keep each SIR in the system above a required threshold SIRi i 0 , 1 i M (4.13). Mobile Wireless Communications cell j BSj cell i BSi dij interfering mobile, cell j mobile, cell i dii Figure 4.6 Distances involved in calculating SIRi To simplify the no tation, we shall henceforth use the symbol i as indicated in (4.13) to represent SIRi . A number of papers have appeared on the subject of power control in the sense indicated in (4.

13) of keeping each SIR above a threshold value. We shall cite only a few. The reader can then check the references in each to come up with a comprehensive list.

In particular, decentralized algorithms were rst applied to power control for satellite systems. Aein (1973) and Meyerhoff (1974), which appeared in the 1970s, are among the earliest papers describing such algorithms. Zander and his group in Sweden have pioneered in developing power control algorithms for cellular wireless systems.

We focus here rst on a distributed power control algorithm, the distributed balancing algorithm or DBA, proposed by Zander (1992). The objective here is to adjust the transmitted power values, Pi , 1 i M, in a distributed fashion, each of the M mobiles working in conjunction with its base station, to attain the maximum achievable SIR. This quantity is de ned as the maximum over all the mobile powers of the minimum SIR.

Using the symbol to represent SIR, as noted above, we have, as the maximum achievable SIR = maxallpowers min i 1 i M (4.13a). The DBA algorithm Code 128C for .NET due to Zander, as well as the one to be described following this discussion, both achieve the same, maximum achievable, SIR for all M mobiles using the same channel. The price to be paid in the use of this algorithm, as we shall see, is that.

Aein, J. M. 1973.

Power balancing in systems employing frequency reuse, Comsat Technology Review, 3, 2 (Fall). Meyerhoff, H. J.

1974. Method for computing the optimum power balance in multibeam satellites, Comsat Technology Review, 4, 1 (Spring). Zander, J.

1992. Distributed cochannel interference control in cellular radio systems, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 41, 3 (August), 304 311..

Dynamic channel allocation and power control a limited amount o f communication between each mobile and its base station, as well as between the M base stations, is necessary. (A modi cation of this and related algorithms, due to Foschini and Miljanic (1993), to be discussed later, eliminates this problem.) The DBA algorithm is a stepwise iterative algorithm.

It requires as input the complete set of gains, G i j 1/di j , 1 i, j M. It assumes as well that these gains do not change during the operation of the algorithm. This implies that rapid convergence to the required SIR value is necessary.

This algorithm turns out, unfortunately, to take relatively long to converge. The second algorithm to be considered, following, which is a modi ed version of this one, converges much more rapidly. Both algorithms require stepwise iteration, starting from some initial set of power values, each mobile in synchronism adjusting its power iteratively.

The two algorithms differ in the adjustment strategy. Consider the nth iteration at mobile i. To simplify the notation, let ri j G i j /G ii , i.

e., the gain factor Gi j normalized to Gii . The DBA algorithm makes the following power adjustment Pi(n) = c(n 1) Pi(n 1) 1 + where.

1 i(n 1). (4.14). i(n 1) = Pi(n 1). P j(n 1)ri j Pi(n 1). (4.15). The constant c(n 1 ) must be greater than zero and the same value is to be selected by all the mobiles. Then, simplifying (4.14) with the use of (4.

15), we have. Pi(n) = c(n 1).
Copyright © barcodeaddin.com . All rights reserved.